Monday, December 18, 2006
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Bang the Bell
I am very interested in getting some comments/views regarding, fitting people's performance/capability into the Bell Curve. The original framework was from, The publication of The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life by the late Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray. The book is about grouping people's IQ based on various controversial factors. Maybe Gaussian distribution also suggested the similar curve with random data.
In order to satisfy any probability/theorems, I always consider two major assumptions. Size of samples have to be big enough. Sample selection has to be random.
For any organized sector, I feel point number two is mostly invalid, since people will have similar qualifications/background. Also the original Bell Curve is for the distribution based on IQ and NOT for the outputs based on IQ.
Why all companies are behind force fitting Bell Curve?
In order to satisfy any probability/theorems, I always consider two major assumptions. Size of samples have to be big enough. Sample selection has to be random.
For any organized sector, I feel point number two is mostly invalid, since people will have similar qualifications/background. Also the original Bell Curve is for the distribution based on IQ and NOT for the outputs based on IQ.
Why all companies are behind force fitting Bell Curve?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)